Keyword

Cognitive Moral Development, Moral Evaluation, Premature Sign-Off, Audit Quality

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether cognitive moral development and moral evaluation factors impact an auditor’s decision to engage in reduced audit quality behaviors. A total of 289 auditors participated in the survey. The Defining Issues Test (DIT) and Multidimensional Ethics Scale Revision (MES-R1) were used to measure cognitive moral development and moral evaluation. The results show that cognitive moral development and moral evaluation have a direct influence on reduced audit quality behavior. The study results also show that moral evaluation (deontology and teleology) mediates the relationship between cognitive moral development and reduced audit quality behavior. The study results have significant implications for accounting organizations and regulators concerning the effect of cognitive moral development and moral evaluation in preventing the negative impact of reduced audit quality behaviors, such as premature sign-off. 


Full Text : PDF

References
  1. Agoglia, C.P., Hatfield, R.C. and Lambert, T.A. (2015) ‘Audit team time reporting: An agency theory perspective’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 44, pp. 1-14.
  2. Alderman, C.W. and Deitrick, J.D. (1982) ‘Auditor’s Perception of Time Budget Pressures and Premature Sign Offs: A Replication and Extension’, Auditing: A journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 54-68.
  3. Cohen, J.R., Pant, L.W. and Sharp, D. (1983) ‘A validation and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 13-26.
  4. Coram, P., Glavovic, A., Ng, J. and Woodliff, D.R. (2008) ‘The moral intensity of reduced audit quality acts’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 127-149.
  5. Coram, P., Ng, J. and Woodliff, D. (2003) ‘A Survey of Time Budget Pressure and Reduced Audit Quality Among Australia Auditors’, Australia Accounting Review, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 38-44.
  6. Donnelly, D.P., Quirin, J.J. and O’Byran, D. (2003) ‘Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: An explanatory model using auditors’ personal characteristics’, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 15, pp. 87-110.
  7. Hunt, S.D. and Vitell, S. (1986) ‘A general theory of marketing ethics. ’, Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 6 No. Spring, pp. 5-16.
  8. Imhoff, J.E.A. (2003) ‘Accounting Quality, Auditing and Corporate Governance’, Accounting Horizon, Vol. 17, pp. 117-128.
  9. Kaplan, S.E. (1995) ‘An Examination of Auditors’ Reporting Intentions Upon Discovery of Procedures Prematurely Signed-Off Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 90-104.
  10. Kohlberg, L. (1969), ‘Stage and sequence: the cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D.A Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research’, Rand McNally, Chicago.
  11. Kohlberg, L. and Hersh, R.H. (2009) ‘Moral development: A review of the theory’, Theory Into Practice, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 53-59.
  12. Lighner, S.M., Adams, S.J. and Lightner, K. (1982) ‘The influence of situational, ethical, and expectancy theory variables on accountans's underreporting behavior’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-12.
  13. Malone, C.F. and Robert, R.W. (1996) ‘Factors Associated with Incidence of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 49-64.
  14. McNair, C.J. (1991) ‘Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 635-653.
  15. Ponemon, L.A. (1990) ‘Ethical judgments in accounting: A cognitive-development perspective’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 1, pp. 191-215.
  16. Ponemon, L.A. (1992) ‘Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17 No. 3/4, pp. 239-258.
  17. Ponemon, L.A. and Gabhart, D.R.L. (1990) ‘Auditor independence judgements: A cognitive-developmental model and experimental evidence’, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 227-251.
  18. Ponemon, L.A. and Gabhart, D.R.L. (1993), ‘Ethical reasoning in accounting and auditing, CGA‐Canada Research Foundation.’, Canada Research Foundation.
  19. Rest, J.R. (1979), ‘Development injudging Moral Issues ’, University of Minnesota Press., Minneapolis, MN.
  20. Shapeero, M., Koh, H.C. and Killough, L.N. (2003) ‘Underreporting and premature sign‐off in public accounting’, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6/7, pp. 478-489.
  21. Svanström, T. (2016) ‘Time Pressure, Training Activities and Dysfunctional Auditor Behaviour: Evidence from Small Audit Firms’, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 42-51.
  22. Sweeney, J.T. and Roberts, R.W. (1997) ‘Cognitive moral development and auditor independence’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 22 No. 3/4, pp. 337-352.
  23. Trevino, L.K. and Youngblood, S.A. (1990) ‘Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision making behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75 No. 4, pp. 378-385.
  24. Utaminingsih, U. and Tyas, T. (2012), "Analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi Premature Sign-off of Audit Procedure pada KAP di Jawa Tengah", in Conference in Business, Accounting and Management.
  25. Wilopo, R. (2006) ‘Faktor-faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Perilaku Disfungsional Auditor : Studi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Jawa Timur’, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 1-12.