Keyword

Country of origin, consumer perception, consumer expectations, purchase likelihood, stereotypes, nation-branding.

Abstract

This two-study, experimental design, research proposes and tests if and how national stereotypes based on perceptions of competence versus warmth affect consumer expectations of the utilitarian versus hedonic nature of products as well as their subsequent purchase likelihood. The results of our first study found that higher perceived warmth results in greater expectations of hedonic product properties, and that higher competence perceptions result in greater expectations of utilitarian properties. It is further shown that perceived competence and warmth mediate the effect of country of origin on utilitarian and hedonic product expectations, respectively. Importantly, the second study demonstrates the downstream impact of national stereotypes on consumer behavior, showing the asymmetric effect of perceived warmth and competence on purchase likelihood of hedonic versus utilitarian products, whereas competent perception favor both utilitarian and hedonic purchase likelihood. Managerial and policy implications are offered for the marketing, retailing, and promotional strategies of products as well as of nation-brands. A social psychology of post-colonial globalization stereotypes nations as more competent ('developed' or ‘emerged’) versus warm (‘developing’ or 'emerging'): what can nations do to deliberately overcome the confines of negative and positive stereotypes in order to best promote their goods and services exports?


Full Text : PDF
References
  1. Aaker, J. (1997) Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research. 34 (Aug). p. 347-57.
  2. Aaker, J., Vohs, K.D. & Mogilner, C. (2010) Nonprofits are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter. Journal of Consumer Research. 37 (Aug). p. 224-37.
  3. Aiken, L. & West, S.G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  4. Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Distinction in Social
  5.      Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of 
  6. Personality and Social Psychology. 51 (6). p. 1173-82.
  7. Bilkey, W. J. & Nes, E. (1982) Country-of-Origin Effects on Product Evaluation. Journal of International Business Studies. 13 (1). p. 89-99.
  8. Chattalas, M. & Takada, H. (2013) Warm versus Competent Countries: National Stereotyping Effects on Expectations of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Product Properties.  Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 9 (2). p. 88-97.
  9. Chattalas, M., Kramer, T. & Takada, H. (2008) The Impact of National Stereotypes on the Country-of-Origin Effect: A Conceptual Framework. International Marketing Review. 25 (1). p. 54 – 74. 
  10. Cohen, J. (1992) White Consumer Response to Asian Models in Advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 9 (2). p. 17-28.
  11. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. (2004) When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn’t Cut the Ice. Journal of Social Issues. 60 (Dec). p. 701-18. 
  12. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008) Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 40 (Mar). p. 61-149.
  13. Devine, P. G. (1989) Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 56 (1). p. 5-18.
  14. Dhar, R. & Wertenbroch, K. (2000) Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research. 37 (1). p. 60-71.
  15. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002) A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow From Perceived Status and Competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 82 (6). p. 878-902.    
  16. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (1999) Respecting Versus Liking: Status and Interdependence Predict Ambivalent Stereotypes of Competence and Warmth. Journal of Social Issues. 55 (3). p. 473-89.
  17. Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008) Death to Dichotomizing. Journal of Consumer Research. 35 (1). p. 5-8.
  18. Fournier, S. (1998) Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in
  19.     Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research. 24 (4). p. 343-73.
  20. Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A. & Newell, S. J. (2000) The Impact of Corporate Credibility on Consumer Reactions to Ads and Brands. Journal of Advertising. 3 (Sep). p. 43-54.
  21. Grandey, A., Disk, G., Mattila, A., Jansen, K. & Sideman, L. (2005) Is ‘Service with a Smile’ Enough? Authenticity of Positive Displays during Service Encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 96 (Jan). p. 38-55.
  22. Han, C. M. (1989) Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct? Journal of Marketing Research. 26 (2). p. 222-29.    
  23. Heslop, L. A. & Papadopoulos, N. (1993) But Who Knows Where or When: Reflections on the Images of Countries and their Products. Product-Country Images. New York, NY: International Business Press.
  24. Heslop, L. A., Papadopoulos, N., Dowdles, M., Wall, M. & Compeau, D. (2004) Who Controls the Purse Strings? A Study of Consumers’ and Retail Buyers’ Reactions in an American FTA Environment. Journal of Business Research. 57. p. 1177-88. 
  25. Hong, S. & Wyer Jr., R. S. (1989) Effects of Country-of-Origin and Product-Attributes: Information on Product Evaluation: An Information Processing Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research. 16 (1). p. 175-87.
  26. Huber, J. & McCann, J. W. (1982) The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research. 19 (Aug). p. 324-33.
  27. Jaffe, E. D. & Nebenzahl, I. D. (2006) National Image and Competitive Advantage. Copenhagen Business School Press.
  28. Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V. & Kashima, Y. (2005) Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations between Judgments of Competence and Warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 89 (Dec). p. 899-913. 
  29. Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R. & Morris, M. D. (1998) The Animosity Model of Foreign Product Purchase: An Empirical Test in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Marketing. 62 (1). p. 89-100.
  30. Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H. & Dubé, L. (1994) Foreign Branding and its Effects on Product Perceptions and Attitudes.Journal of Marketing Research. 31 (4). p. 263-70. 
  31. Lee, T. L. & Fiske, S. T. (2006) Not an Outgroup, Not Yet an In-group: Immigrants in the Stereotype Contents Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 30 (6). p. 751-68.
  32. Li, W. & Wyer Jr., R. S. (1994) The Role of Country of Origin in Product Evaluations: Informational and Standard-of-Comparison Effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 3 (2). p. 187-212.
  33. Lin, M. H., Kwan, V. S. Y., Cheung, A. & Fiske, S. T. (2005) Stereotype Content Model Explains Prejudice for an Envied Outgroup: Scale of Anti-Asian American Stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 31 (1). p. 34-47.
  34. Maheswaran, D. (1994) Country of Origin as a Stereotype: Effects of Consumer
  35.     Expertise and Attribute Strength on Product Evaluations. Journal of Consumer 
  36.     Research. 21 (1). p. 354-65.
  37. Mano, H. & Oliver, R. L. (1993) Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling and Satisfaction. Journal of     Consumer Research. 20 (2). p. 451-66.
  38. Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J. & MacInnis, D. J. (1986) Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management. Journal of Marketing. 50 (4). p. 135-45.
  39. Pharr, J. M. (2005) Synthesizing Country-of-Origin Research from the Last Decade: Is the Concept Still Salient in an Era of Global Brands. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice. 13 (4). p. 34-45.
  40. Poppe, E. & Linssen, H. (1999) In-group Favouritism and the Reflection of Realistic Dimensions of Difference between National States in Central and Eastern European Nationality Stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology. 38 (1). p. 85-102.
  41. Ries, A. & Trout, J. (2001) Positioning: The Battle for your Mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  42. Shimp, T. A. & Sharma, S. (1987) Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research. 24 (3). p. 280-89. 
  43. Srivastava, J. & Mitra, A. (1998) Warranty as a Signal of Quality: The Moderating Effect of Consumer Knowledge on Quality Evaluations. Marketing Letters. 9 (4). p. 327-36.
  44. Teas, R. K. & Agarwal, S. (2000) The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers' Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 28 (Spring). p. 278-90. 
  45. Verlegh, P. W. J. & Steenkamp, J. E. M. (1999) A Review and Meta-analysis of Country-of-Origin Research. Journal of Economic Psychology. 20 (5). p. 521-46.
  46. Yeung, C. W. M. & Wyer Jr., R. S. (2004) Affect, Appraisal, and Consumer Judgment. Journal
  47.     of Consumer Research. 31 (1). p. 412-24.
  48. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R. & Grohmann, B. (2003) Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Product Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research. 40 (3). p. 310-20.