Political Socialization Process, Opinion Leader, Voting Behavior, Community Agents, Pakistan.


In political system, voters belong to diverse nature of communities. These communities have their own particular set of voting behaviors that emerged out from an ongoing social-interaction process. Similarly, their voting intentions are the outcome of their participation in social networks and learning from community’s socialization process. Where, social agents play very significant and influential contribution in shaping the community’s overall voting behavior. These social agents influence and are influenced by the community members during the process. This research begins to address the opinion leading role of opinion leaders in community’s overall voting behaviors and in political brand building at constituency level. This is done by conceptualizing a socialization process model that is empirically evaluated by surveying and collecting 550 valid responses from registered voters of selected constituency. A carefully designed questionnaire was used to collect the empirical data from the respondents. The structural equation modeling technique was employed to analyze the possible relationship between the different constructs of the conceptualized model. Study in hand concludes that opinion leaders play very important role in convincing and wining the voters for a particular political party through provision of relevant information, brand advocacy and powerful word-of-mouth within their electoral communities. Furthermore, they exert high social pressure on political par

Full Text : PDF

  1. Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 291-295.
  2. Bagozzi, R. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 32-39.
  3. Baker, C.E. (1989). Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Beck, P.A. Dalton, R.J., Greene, S. & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, Organizational Influence in Presidential Choices. American Political Science Review, Vol. 96, No.1, pp. 57–73.
  5. Burt, R.S., (1987). Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, pp. 287-335.
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Carl, W.J. (2006). What’s all the buzz about? Everyday communication and the relational basis of word-of-mouth and buzz marketing practices. Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 601-634.
  8. Cwalina, W., Falkowski, A. and Kaid, L.L. (2000). Role of advertising in forming the image of politicians: Comparative analysis of Poland, France, and Germany. Journal of Media Psychology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp 119-146.
  9. Dalton, R. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  10. Derbaix, C. and Vanhamme, J. (2003). Inducing word-of-mouth by eliciting surprise – a pilot investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 99-116.
  11. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 265-279.
  12. Dostie-Goulet, E. (2009). Social networks and the development of political interest. Journal of Youth Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 405- 421.
  13. Dwyer, F.R. and Oh, S. (1987). Output sector munificence effects on the internal political economy of marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 347-358.
  14. Election Commission of Pakistan (2011). General Election Rsults 1988- 2008, retrieved on 23-12-2011, at 13:25, from
  15. Elliot, R. and Yannopoulou, N. (2007). The nature of trust in brands:a psychosocial model. European Journal of Marketing Vol. 41, No. 9/10, pp. 988-998.
  16. Fuse, K. and Hanada, N. (2009). Political Distrust and Gendered Attitudes: The Japanese State and Women. Journal of Sex Roles, Vol. 60, pp. 843–858.
  17. Goldenberg, J., Libai, B. and Muller, E. (2001). Talk of the network: a complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 211-23.
  18. Gro¨nroos, C. (1990). Relationship approach to marketing in service contexts: the marketing organizational interface. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 3-11.
  19. Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B.J. and Anderson R. E. (2007). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition, Prentice Hall.
  20. Hooper, D. Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 53-60.
  21. Huckfeldt, R. (2007). Unanimity, Discord, and the Communication of Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 978–95.
  22. Hu, L., and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Covariance structures analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Journal of Structure equation modeling, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-55.
  23. Kautz, K. and Larsen, E.A. (2000). Disseminating quality management and software process improvement innovations. Journal of Information Technology & People, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 11-26.
  24. Kaye, B. K, & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol. 46, pp. 54–71.
  25. Kleiner, A. (2003). Core groups: a theory of power and influence for ‘learning’ organizations.  Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 666-683.
  26. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  27. Knoke, D. (2003). Political Networks; the Structural Perspective. Cambridge University Press, USA
  28. Laumann, E. O., and Pappi, F. (1976). Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.
  29. Lenard, P. T. (2005). The Decline of Trust, The Decline of Democracy? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 363- 378.
  30. Litvin, S.W., Goldsmith, R.E. and Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Journal of Tourism Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 458-68.
  31. Lupia, A. & Sin, G. (2003). Which public goods are endangered? How evolving communication technologies affect the logic of collective action. Public Choice, Vol. 117, No. 3-4, pp. 315–331.
  32. MacCallum, R.C. Browne, M.W. and Sugawara,H.W. (1996). Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 130-149.
  33. McQuitty, S. (2004). Statistical power and structural equation models in business research. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 175-183.
  34. Nadel, S. F., (1957). The Theory of Social Structure. Giencoe, II.: Free Press.
  35. Pan, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (2003). Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 12, pp. 71-88.
  36. Phipps, M., Brace-Govan, C. and Jevones C (2010). The duality of political brand Equity, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44 No. 3/4, pp. 496-514.
  37. Picard, R.D. (1985). The press and the decline of democracy: The democratic socialist response in public policy. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
  38. Richey, S. (2008). The autoregressive influence of social network political knowledge on voting behavior. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 38, pp. 527 – 542.
  39. Ring, P.S. and Van de Ven, A. (1994). Development processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, pp. 90-118.
  40. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A. and King, J. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 99, No. 6, pp. 323-337.
  41. Shapiro, S.P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, pp. 623-658.
  42. Siebert, F.S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1963). Four theories of the press. Freeport, NY: Books of Libraries Press.
  43. Smith, G. (2005). Positioning political parties: The 2005 UK general election. Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 21, No. 9, pp 1135-1149.
  44. Splichal, S. (2006). In search of a strong European public sphere: Some critical observations on conceptualizations of publicness and the (European) public sphere. Journal of Media, culture & society, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 695–714.
  45. Stolle, D. & Hooghe, M. (2005). Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate About the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies. British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 35, No.1, pp.149-167.
  46. Toral, S., Martı´nez-Torres, M., Barrero, F. and Corte’s, F. (2009). An empirical study of the driving forces behind online communities. Journal of Internet Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 378-392.
  47. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.