The Research of Motivation for Word-of-Mouth: Based on the Self-Determination Theory
Article Metrics Report
Views, downloads, citations, engagementCited by
Current citation countResearch summary
To understand the generation of WOM motivation, this research studies the relationship between three innate psychological needs (e.g. autonomy, competence, and relatedness) and word-of-mouth motivation based on Self-Determination Theory. How the expertise of the sender, the relationship strength between the sender and the receiver affect the motivation of word-of-mouth through these three psychological needs is also studied. A questionnaire based survey was employed to collect data. The results indicate that three psychological needs affect the motivation of word-of-mouth. Moreover, the expertise of the sender affects the motivation of word-of-mouth through competence need, and the relationship strength between the sender and the receiver affects word-of-mouth motivation through relatedness need. This study will help companies to get deeper understanding of WOM motivation, and suggestions is given to improve satisfaction of consumer basic psychological needs in marketing activities.
Article History
How to Cite
Shen, W., Huang, J., & Li, D.. (2016). The Research of Motivation for Word-of-Mouth: Based on the Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 2.
Citation Context
APA
Shen, W., Huang, J., & Li, D.. (2016). The Research of Motivation for Word-of-Mouth: Based on the Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 2.
MLA
Shen, Wenguo, et al.. "The Research of Motivation for Word-of-Mouth: Based on the Self-Determination Theory." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 2, 2016.
Chicago
Wenguo Shen, Jingmian Huang, and Dan Li. "The Research of Motivation for Word-of-Mouth: Based on the Self-Determination Theory." Journal of Business and Retail Management Research Volume 10 Issue 2 (25 Apr 2016).
Harvard
Shen, W., Huang, J., & Li, D. (2016) The Research of Motivation for Word-of-Mouth: Based on the Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 10 Issue 2
References
- Anderson, E. W. 1998. Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth. Journal of service. 1:5-17
- Bansal, H.S. & P.A. Voyer. 2000. Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context. Journal of Service Research. 3(2): 166-177
- Bristor, J.M. 1990. Enhanced Explanations of Word-of-mouth Communications: The power of Relationships [J]. Research in Consumer Behavior. 4: 51-83
- Brown, T.J. 2005. Spreading the Word: Investigating Antecedents of Consumers' Positive Word-of-Mouth Intentions and Behaviors in a Retailing Context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 33(2): 123-138
- Childers, T. L., C. L. Carr, P. Joann, & C. Stephen. 2001. Hedonic and Utilitarian Motivations for online Retail Shopping Behavior. Journal of Retailing. 77: 511-535
- Deci, E.L. & R.M. Ryan, 2001. The 'What' and 'Why' of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 11(4): 227-242
- Dichter, E. 1996. How Word-of-Mouth Advertising Works. Harvard Business Review. 44(6): 147-161
- Engel, J. F., R. J. Kegerreis & R.D. Blackwell. 1969. Word-of-Mouth Communication by the Innovator. The Journal of Marketing. 33(3): 15-19
- Fieck, L.F.,& L. L. Price. 1987. The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information. Journal of Marketing. 51(1): 87-97
- Frenzen, J. K. & K. Nakamoto. 1993. Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information, Journal of Consumer Research. 20: 360-375
- Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Kevin P. Gwinner, Gianfranco Walsh & Dwayne D. Gremler. 2004. Electronic Word of Mouth via Consumer-opinion Platforms——What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing. 18(1): 38-52
- Lihong Liu & Jijia Zhang. 2010. The Theory and application of Self-determination on Motivation, Academic Journal of Huanan Normal University (Social Science). 4: 53-59
- Mee-Shew, C., M.M. Anitsal & I. Anitsal. 2007. Revisiting Word-of-mouth Communications; A Cross-National Exploration. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice. 15(3): 235-249
- Mitchell, A.A. & P.A. Dacin. 1996. The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise. Journal of Consumer Research. 23(3): 219-239
- Netemeyer, R.G., W.O. Bearden & J.E. Teel. 1992. Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence and Attributional Sensitivity. Psychology & Marketing. 9(5): 379-394
- Price, L.L., L.F. Feick & A. Guskey. 1995. Everyday Market Helping Behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. 14(2): 255-266
- Smith, D. N. 2002. Trust Me, Would I Steer You Wrong? The Influence of Peer Recommendations within Virtual Communities. Doctoral. Thesis, University of Illinois, Chicago
- Sundaram, D.S., K. Mitra & C. Webster. 1998. Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis. Advances in Consumer Research. 25(1): 527-531
- Vallerand, R.J. 1997. Toward a Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 27: 271-360
- Wirtz, J. & P. Chew. 2002. The Effects of Incentives, Deal Proneness, Satisfaction and Tie Strength on Word-of-mouth Behaviour. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 13(2): 141-162